Request for Asterisk or Free Switch Installation

Hi,

I am looking for someone who can establish for a reasonable amount on a shared server is a small VoIP network. (Either on FreeSwitch or Asterisk-based)

We would prefer to have Windows-based, so we can take even more care.

The number of users would be max. 10-15 should register Aich from across Europe.

-4 Permanent jobs
- 5-10 freelancers

The Windows server would cost reasons we host here:

http://www.easycgi.com/easycgi/share...ing/?kbid=5100

As we would like to use softphone Ninja Pro. Hard as we focus on Snom Phone M9

What we need:

- TLS encryption (End to Server. Server-to-end)
- Automatic transmission to the normal number, if not a VoIP client is reachable. (Also on mobile phone, fixed line)
- The office equipment should ring all, if someone calls the main number.

Bids will be compared with an offer for a kommezielles 3CX system that works, apparently very good and reliable.

I am grateful for the offers.

Gr. I.

---

Hi,

So if Windows is required, Asterisk is ever gone as an option.
What is the snom M9?
If the server is powerful enough to ensure the encryption in real time? Note that this also the voice traffic can not run more PtP (which would be useful in a distributed network and the latency keeps small). How many interviews should be conducted at the same time? How should the connection be made to the landline? What kind of phone features to the system because all have?

Please note that Windows does not as the OS that can be serviced FreeSwitch easier! I would always recommend to run the software on Linux, since she has been tested better.

Ask yourself regarding 3CX and what does it cost to upgrade and what features are missing.
(I always look at the "new" features of the current release and wonder that are only now become an integral part. Most are at the Asterisk default long ago.)

Would be a different OS-phone software with web front end in question?

---

Quote:

Originally Posted by VoIP_isti We would prefer to have Windows-based, so we can take even more care.

Just as the majority also an Exchange or even AD versaubeuteln uh can maintain

A professional solution, such as one based on Asterisk, with WebGUI you should put all options. For the better you have no licensing the Speaker dependent features.

---

How about for times, with reasonable cite? Please review review. Thank you!

---

Hi,

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner "What is the snom M9?"

It is a DECT phone from the manufacturer "Snom" ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner If the server is powerful enough to ensure the encryption in real time? "

TLS is a very important aspect for us. P2P communication would be in the case of a allgmeienen Move. not so important. The server would be a shared server:

http://www.easycgi.com/easycgi/share...ing/?kbid=5100

How strong he is, it's a very good question ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner How many interviews should be conducted at the same time? "

4-5


Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner "How is the connection made to the landline?"

The individual "listeners to" first, if possible, the internal secure VoIP Call-ID. If it is not possible, should the client call through the local T-Com Port simply the respective phone number. The softphone client to achieve the "normal" number, by one other SIP providers. So here we are flexible. It would be very important that when someone calls my office connection it kliengt both in the office and on my notebook. (I am very often on the road)

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner What kind of phone features to the system because even have? "

- Each user should be able to both softphone as well as a hard phone conference call to initiiren.
- Should some of the users 'voice mail' have.
- If someone in the internal VoIP network should not try to find the relevant telephone him / her to achieve on a different port. Come here in Germany T-Com, O2 and France Telecom in France question.
- The system should in any case always bevorziehen the TLS-encrypted communications.

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner I would always recommend to run the software on Linux, since she has been tested better. "

If there is no additional administrative training goes, you ...

Quote:

Originally Posted by Doerner Would be a different OS-phone software with web front end in question?

Of course! I abs. no matter what system is used.

It must be to manage, must be cheap to be with my 15 years of Windows experience. Must be compatible and would TLS with the M9 and softphones are supported. It would also run on a shared server, because the GF is not willing to book now € 2000, - to spend on a dedicated server.

@ Foschi:

Quote:

Originally Posted by Foschi "A professional solution, such as one based on Asterisk, with WebGUI you should put all options available"

Yes you. I have little experience with the stuff. How much effort would be set up on the linked server or on a shared Linux server?

I can live with all platforms, if the VoIP system calls for every little thing (setting up new users, etc.) is not a Linux expert.

A certain training should therefore be included in the offer:

- Remote Access on the server
- How it reboots.
- Starting the VoIP system
- Enable server logging, disable
- Configuration Backup to create, etc.

I've had enough, however, if someone sends this basic information in writing.

With Web-GUI, it seems to be OK, I must be the main thing I do not bother with command line.

Thanks for your help and if necessary offers.

Gr. I.

---

So I know because only the m3, snom. Note also that this only works if and only on SIP as well, albeit the snom DECT base station is used. (For there lies inside the SIP-intelligence.)

I personally think the m3 somewhat cumbersome and prefer very clear (albeit more expensive solution of Kirk DECT-IP 300 with 5020 Handhelds). Aastra has incidentally also a DECT SIP solution ...

And as the local T-Com port on the shared-server is connected?

I do not think that setting up an Asterisk server will be cheaper than a 3CX solution. But this is also related that can be both difficult to compare. This is particularly so if you want updates and "special requests".

But I think it will be before enough problems with the set-up.
In any case, you should consider you an exact specification, such as exactly which calls are routed and implement the functions in the installation.

Greeting
Jan-Hendrik

PS: The snom's seem to me so well from the house of Kirk come to ....